ECOS Executive
Team Fall Planning Retreat
Meeting Report
The
ECOS Executive Team meet at Menucha on October 11-12, 1999 for a fall planning
retreat. Participants included: Patti Swanson - Eastwind Center, Jess Kappel
- Vocational Rehabilitation, Sharron Kelley and Robert Trachtenberg - Multnomah
County Board of Commissioners, Suanne Jackson and Kristin Wolff - worksystems
inc., Mary Kowalsky and Gwen Nothwang - MHCC, Karen Cusick, Dave Allen, and Sue
Taylor - Employment Department, Joanne Espinosa - Springdale Job Corps, Carolyn
Morrison - Childcare Support Services, Claudia King and Helen Estrada - Human
Solutions, Kelly Carroll - Adult Community Justice/Parole and Probation, Charlotte Dorsey - Colormyweb, webmaster,
Lorena Campbell - East County Caring Community, and facilitator - Joan Pasco.
Opening Exercise:
East County One Stop: What is it and what does it mean to you?
·
Opportunity
to work together
·
Relationships
- two systems working in concert --
workforce and social services
·
There
are no silver bullets left. Lots of
issues and we need to work together to solve problems
·
Hard
for individuals to survive economically - ECOS offers an opportunity to look at
the issues facing individuals and what systemic issues can be negotiated -- together, as a team, to improve the life
situations of the people we serve
·
ECOS
offers the customer good/efficient referral and information on services and
helps us connect with each other
·
A
better focus on the applicant and the employer, more rounded scope of
activities and more people being served
·
The
early ECOS focus on technology was wise, creating systems that work together
and can interact has been important to us
·
ECOS
has developed as a pro-active tool; prior to our coming together we were always
in a reactive role - for everyone, the customer, the employer and our agencies.
What is one thing that ECOS
could do for you/your agency/your customers?
·
Better
coordination with employers
·
Marketing
what ECOS is and what it is accomplishing
·
Expanding/finding
new resources for child care and helping deal with breakdowns in child care…
·
Stay
current with the implications and impacts from population growth in east county
and the changing demographics, growth in children and low income families
·
Continue
to work on reducing the need for multiple agencies to knock on doors…the One
Stop concept is not there yet.
·
Foster
the awareness that business services and social services need to work together
and support each other.
·
Figure
out a way to evaluate soft services, there are ways to do this. We need new tools to evaluate what we do,
and how well we do it….are we succeeding and how do we know?
·
Continue
to inform the rest of the region about the nature of east county: the large geographic area in relation to
rest of the county, the fact that over 2/3’s of the county people are served
here.
·
Continue
with the “any door is the right door” approach - and identify the doors and
market the system
·
Expand
the ECOS focus within each agency. Get
at least 1/3 of agency staff involved at some level, help market the ECOS
partner services within each of our agencies.
Do this before starting to market to the outside community of employers
and job seekers
·
Develop
resources in multiple languages
What has changed in the past
year? How is our environment/landscape
different?
·
More
advanced technology
·
Workforce
Investment Act has changed the focus; being an early implementer is difficult
to anticipate regs and other issues
·
Human
Solutions going through leadership change
·
Job
Corps: new leadership locally, lots of
changes and reorganization at the national level that have local implications
·
What
does Universal Access really mean? What
will we each have to do to be compliant? How do we serve walk-ins that are new
populations for us? Lots of questions
·
More
pressure to expand focus beyond our traditional populations, must work with
other agencies in a more integrated way, must be able to share information more
freely and easily
·
Employers
are required (by WIA) to be more involved in the design of our programs, and
traditionally, this has been difficult to achieve
·
Training
needs will increase as we roll out WIA - certification of programs and
providers will required new system activity and resources
·
Trust
levels are higher than they were last year - both within ECOS and between other
one stops in the region
System Capacity Issues and
Creative Solutions:
Commissioner
Sharron Kelley set the stage for this discussion by providing an overview of
the latest east county population demographics. 2/3’s of the people needing social services live east of 82nd
Avenue. There is a higher percentage of
children and single heads of households in the area, and the population’s average
family income levels continue to decline.
Most programs are experiencing a 15% annual increase in the number of
clients they are asked to serve, with no increase in resources to do so. In some cases, budgets have forced staff
cuts while the population to be served continued to climb, creating huge case
loads for remaining staff. There
are significant system capacity issues emerging from this trend.
The
group discussion focused on resources, or lack thereof, and barriers to
providing adequate services to the population of east county. One significant area of need is access to
mental health services for all ECOS partners.
Mental Health services/providers should be at the ECOS table and
currently are not.
Community Asset Discussion:
Four
areas defined as untapped resources to help build system capacity were: Youth, Religions Institutions, the business
community and Senior Citizen groups.
The planning group split into four work groups to develop ideas on how
ECOS could develop relationships that could bring these three resources
together with defined system need. The
group recommendations included:
Youth:
“New and Do” Project:
Program to teach youth something new, and find what they can in turn do
for someone else. Site the project in
one of the local churches. Create a “youth
one stop” at this site and incorporate it with the existing ECOS system. Project will involve:
1.
Needs
Assessment: What can young people tap
into? Where is assistance needed?
2.
Figure
out a reward system: savings
voucher/gift certificates donated from local merchants? Something of value for
the kids that participate
3.
Interview
Youth: What are the resources kids bring to the table? What can they do? Assess their talents and
expertise
4.
Connect
youth with projects that will teach them something new also…make them more
employable, help them build a portfolio
5.
Try
to get the schools to institutionalize a community service requirement in order
to graduate
Issues
to be worked out: Drivers license requirements
- other transportation issues; certain liability issues if kids will be working
with young children/day care situations, etc.; any pre-training or testing that
may have to be completed to enable young people to work with certain
populations.
Religions Institutions:
Project
to help meet the child care needs of the east county community: Use local churches to:
1.
Conduct
and site after school projects from 3 PM to 6 PM for kids with no one at home
and no where to go
2.
Site
ESL and limited English speaker training, tutoring, mentoring activities
3.
Tie
in to local high schools community service projects to get assistance with day
care, after school projects, and language tutorials
4.
Use
local congregations as access points to market ECOS services/activities
Create
and fund a full time position to coordinate this activity with the youth
project described above. Tap into
federal state and local child care resources, apply to foundations for funding,
consider city park and rec funds as potential contributors to both of these
projects. Tie them together into one
funding package…
Business Community
Concept: Create a relationship with the new
hotel/motels in the east county area to do two things:
1.
help
them find and develop a pool of job applicants
2.
engage
them in a process to donate empty rooms to displaced people needing emergency
shelter
Discussion: how to engage the small business majority in
workforce system activity. Key
issue: income gap between what most
jobs in the county pay and what is needed to exceed poverty levels.
Senior Citizens
Goal: Help seniors get matched into jobs. They are often overlooked, need income, may
wish to be self-employed, may be able to mentor emerging new businesses, ie.
SCORE. Utilize a multi-employer
approach to hiring senior citizen’s on full or part time basis. Consider the resource seniors could provide
to larger employers.
Goal: Engage seniors in meaningful volunteer
activities that contribute to system capacity
Two Year Approach:
Year one:
·
Identify
skills of this population: Maturity,
Life skills, Job skills, Reliability, etc.
·
Identify
the occupational areas most appropriate for this population, where will seniors
be able to compete for jobs?
·
Determine
the skill requirements of the occupations
·
Determine
gap training needed for job entry
·
Conduct
employer outreach,
Year two:
·
Link
seniors to employers
·
Establish
a single place for employers to contact the senior working network
Second Pilot Project: Connect seniors to childcare needs:
·
Train
a cadre of volunteers or paid helpers to enable them to provide care for sick
children, the developmentally disabled or children with issues that make them
hard to care for in home or traditional child care centers.
·
Utilize
local retirement centers as potential emergency care centers for these children
·
Focus
on the Rockwood area and other low income areas where working moms have few childcare
options
·
Use
the senior group as mentors for teen parents and parents who need parenting
skills
Funder
possibilities: Ronald McDonald
Foundation, AARP,
Employer Services
Strategies:
Dave
Allen and Joan Pasco presented an update on the Business Services Specialist
position and activities. The following
activities will comprise the initial focus for this position in East County:
Business Services
Specialist: (Dave Allen’s position)
1999
- 2000 Task list:
·
Staff
and coordinate the Employer Services Team
·
Attend
and support the Job Developer Network
·
Assist
with the distribution and marketing of the employee referral card to employers
·
Help
craft career path strategies for industries such as the hospitality/hotel/motel
folks that pay minimum wage to most of their employees…educate employers about
their role as a revolving door for entry wage employees; organize an initial
fact finding meeting with representatives of this industry and our employer
services team
·
Help
establish an employer advisory team that uses existing forums such as the
Gresham Employer Council and the program advisory councils at MHCC
·
Work
with the regional task force that is establishing a regional employer services
strategy
Ideas discussed:
·
Attend
meetings where employers gather:
Chambers, Rotary, Human Resource groups, and others
·
Listen
to employers - conduct a needs assessment
·
Find
solutions for business needs as expressed in the needs assessment
·
Become
a resource for them
·
Develop
relationships
·
Single
point of contact: Outreach and
access. Prevent multiple contacts -
work together for any employer outreach - schools, job corps, ECOS, and others
- employers get tired of being approached and are weary of surveys…we all ask
the same questions. They want to know
why we don’t talk to each other instead of to them.
·
Do
a gap analysis on the needs of small businesses - what can we do for them? Training, workshops, benefits? Create win-wins between the workforce
development community and small businesses
·
Market
a menu of employer services that ECOS can provide to the employer community
·
Conduct
short employer recognition sessions:
lunch or breakfast
·
Use
the Internet more as a point of information distribution to employers
·
Conduct
mini-workshops like the EAP workshops that are being conducted by Working
Solutions - four sessions, breakfast meetings, issues: retention, family friendly work policies
etc.
·
What
can we offer? People - potential
employees, Services: LMI, SIP,
training, EAP and employee counseling, treatment, retention, low cost training,
coordination of activity and approach, should be able to save them time and
money. Probably our two best selling
points….if we can follow through.
The
summary reports from employer survey and focus group activity were distributed
and discussed. (Attached to this document)
Demand Side Workforce
Strategy for East County:
Dave
Allen and Joan Pasco led the discussion/review of the community plan completed
last spring prior to the RFP process for worksystems inc. The group split into four workgroups to
flesh out program ideas for each of the four goals identified in that
process. Group reports are represented in the attached action plan matrix.
501 c 3 Discussion: Led by
Robert Trachtenberg and Jess Kappel
ECOS
established a structure committee in April of 1999 to explore legal structure options
available to manage as an independent organization and to solicit public and
private funds. Robert and Jess reviewed
the process to date, the articles of incorporation, bylaws, timeline and formation
agreements that have been prepared by Robert and reviewed by the Executive
Committee. The Executive Committee
agreed to make a recommendation to proceed at its September meeting. After extensive discussion by the retreat
participants, this recommendation was reaffirmed with MHCC abstaining from the
vote. The full ECOS Steering Committee
will act on this recommendation at the October 29 Steering Committee meeting.
Marketing: What do we have to sell and to whom?
After
an overview of the types of marketing materials being used by other workforce
regions, the state, and individual programs, the group split into small teams
to develop ideas on how to market the services being provided by ECOS and its
partner agencies.
The
small teams were charged with identifying who ECOS should market to, what
action is desired from each market segment, how each can be reached, and what
tools would be most effective to reach each target market.
Participants
identified an internal marketing approach as the first step. Staff of our own agencies need to have
information on ECOS, what it does, what our partner agencies do, and what
services are available collectively and individually within the east county one
stop system.
Beyond
the internal marketing, the groups identified the following targets:
Employers/Business Community: to include - Business Associations, Human Resource Associations,
Chambers of Commerce. Use a separate
approach for large, medium and small businesses, all of which will need different
approach. The most effective approach
to businesses of all sizes, will be one-on-one. This is expensive and time consuming. Materials that we do use should have consistency in look and appearance. We should not market to employers until we
are ready with a defined product that can be delivered quickly. The best approach to get information to
employers will be through speaking opportunities where they gather: association meetings, business trade fairs,
etc. The marketing tool recommended by
this team was a printed file folder where employers can file ECOS and workforce
development information. They also
recommended use of the state one stop logo and having a stamp made…to
id business cards and other materials with the one stop logo.
Job Seekers: The job seeker team explored the following marketing
targets: Public transit users, people
who are really desperate, the general public, the underemployed, emerging
employees (youth, corrections, displaced homemakers), Latino youth, and
ethnically specific populations. The
following tools were ID’d as appropriate ways to reach these targets, with each
message being specific to the intended target audience.
Bumper
stickers on all state, county and city cars directly people to the one stop
system.
Posters
on MAX and buses. Signs or stickers on
kiosks and lottery machines, park benches.
Notices in church bulletins, grocery stores and grocery bags, milk cartons, ads in movie
theaters - on the screen prior to movies, OCHA Leadership Conference, Job
fairs, web sites, cable access, Internet banner ads, care stereo stores,
libraries, food banks, hospital waiting areas, and the post office.
Community at Large: Flyers, posters, grocery
bags, sponsor community events, kiosks, public speaking, PSA spots on Latino
radio stations. Need to develop a list of talking
points to distribute to our people to use when they get an opportunity to talk
about the One Stop System.
Our own One Stop partners: Staff meetings, retreats and training, more shared logos,
training more people within each organization, job fairs and career development
events.
Local Government: Create an advocacy strategy:
presentations, one-on-one. Need
to begin to create an identity with the four commissioners who will be on
the board after Sharron is gone. We
will lose our champion at that level in January, 2001.
Workforce
Investment Act Discussion:
Kristin
Wolff, worksystems, inc. presented an update on WIA: What it is, what it means, how it will impact what we do. Highlights included:
Our
region is an early implementer and as such, we have a chance to help define the
regs and performance measures. The first draft of interim regs are due out in
December. The legislation has a five
year span, sunseting in 2003. This legislation
is a universal service model, but still maintains the traditional JTPA target
groups: low income and welfare to work
groups. Local Workforce Investment Boards
have the capacity to identify additional target groups – i.e. refugee,
non-English speakers, etc. The local board has identified the Region 2 target
as families who need services. Period – wsi put the income cap at a middle
class level versus a poverty level.
Local
goals include a life long learning continuum - helping people with 1st
job, 2nd job, and next job.
Key elements include: One Stop
is now law, mandated partners will have to work within the local one stop
system, empowering the individual to be
in charge of their own training activity is integral to the act, changes offer
lots of promise and lots of possibility – should be more flexibility at state
and local levels. There is an
opportunity to experiment with different kinds of models and locally, we will
fight any resistance to this ability to experiment.
Youth
services are being treated very differently under the new act. Oregon used workflex authority to combine
year around and summer job programs., WIA mandates the year around activity and
if you want summer programs you have to carve these out of the existing budget. A two year follow up is required and this is
expensive to run, the cities are unhappy as they perceived lots of reasons to
run the summer programs - crime reduction, etc.
“If
it’s not in the law, you can do it.
Proceed until apprehended” – seems to be the tendency at the federal
level right now, so early implementing areas are not raising issues that may
bring resistance from the feds.
Program
certification of local one stop providers:
Who can be a one stop provider? Local
boards are responsible for this determination thru their RFP process,
certification criteria will be developed at the state level, but refined at the
local level.
Individual
Training Accounts: Discussion around
models being used locally. May model after
the ITA’s currently used by Human Solutions or the DWP process. OJT, community based training, and
specialized programs will be allowed to accept ITA vouchers. Access to training dollars will depend on
need - low income, however, wsi is trying to pull in other dollars that are
less restrictive, such as the Bureau of Community Housing Department funds that
were part of this year’s RFP.
There
is a statewide taskforce working on provider certification issues. We should be able to learn something from
the recommendations from this group.
The
Memorandum of Understanding between partners must be something that adds value
to the process…most likely will continue to be addressed through the contract
process.
Performance
measures: will drive the system, and we
don’t know what they are going to look like.
Employer and customer satisfaction surveys at the regional level have
enormous potential as a key indicator to determine if the One Stop system and
its services are meeting local needs.
There will be an effort to more the performance measurement drivers in
this direction…some support from other early implementer states.
State
level structure for WIA implementation oversight: Falls under the Governor’s Office with Annette Talbott at the
helm of the Governor’s Workforce Policy Cabinet which is comprised of Cam Preus-Braly
as head of the Oregon Department of Community Colleges and Workforce
Development, Virlena Crosley - Employment Dept., Lynnae Ruttledge - VRD, Sandie
Hoback - AFS, as well as reps from Oregon Community and Economic Development
and department of Education. The Oregon
Career Network which has been administering the Federal One Stop Implementation
grant reports to both the Governors Policy Cabinet and the Employment
Department.
Final Comments and Next
Steps:
Priorities:
·
Develop
concrete concept papers around the ideas generated during the community asset
and action planning process. Several
have the capability of attracting foundation funding if packaged into a
proposal. Many can be implemented with
existing resources. Next step is to
work out the details on these concepts - what, who, resources needed, when…create
a strategy to approach funders.
·
Marketing: One or two ideas are doable right now: The
file folder for employers and the bumper stickers to go on all public and
agency cars
·
Staff
awareness: of what ECOS is – more training
on how to make the process work. One
Stop operational workshop in Jan - Feb., the one stop contact person training
on October 27, more interaction between agencies, visit staff meetings,
coordinate a job shadow program.
·
Employer
Services Inventory: Get this completed
at the regional level.
·
Meet
with Dr. Tom Kennedy regarding new ways to fund workforce development, creating
our own entity and aggressively pursuing new funding.
·
Create
a way to get mental health professionals/agencies involved at the One Stop
table… Kelly and Lorena will organize a
meeting with Rod Caulkins, Janice Gratton, and others to begin the dialogue
with ECOS leadership.
·
We
also need more involvement from AFS and from aging programs.
Report Attachments and Meeting Handouts:
Employer focus groups: Key suggestions and recommendations:
When
coaching people for interviews:
Do Not:
Advise
applicants to call back after the interview
Advise
them to send thank you notes unless it is for a professional/management
position
Have
applicants use the same resume writing program/formatting - too often they all
look alike
Over
coach to the point that the applicant appears plastic/or is obviously
delivering rehearsed lines
Allow
program participants to get by with a poor attendance or participation rate,
create the same rules that they will have to live with in a work environment
Do:
Have
applicants bring a portfolio with credentials, awards, certificates, past
performance evaluations, anything that can demonstrate above average
performance.
Brief
them on the assessment tools that employers will be using. If in doubt, call first to find out.
Video
them in practice interview sessions.
Set
high standards for job training programs and adhere to the standards.
Teach
team work - this is complex and complicated, do it right, bring in employers to
help
What employers tell us they
want in job applicants:
Integrity,
motivation, honesty, good attitude, a
sense of urgency,
Communication,
communication, communication: written
and verbal
Willingness
and ability to learn
Work
ethic
Customer
service, people skills, how to be a nice person
Drug
free
Applicants
that can do what their degree/certification indicates they should be able to do
Send
us people with realistic expectations about what the job can offer - students
are often not aware that they will start at the bottom and have to work up
Technically
competent - computer literacy is essential for all jobs
What training employers are
requesting:
·
Classes
in computer forensics
·
Employer
training on use of assessment tools - how to construct, how to use, legal
issues surrounding employment,
·
Teach
employers (esp. small businesses) how to hire, how to find talent, what interview
questions to ask to determine good fit etc.
·
Pre-employment
training on what employers will expect, what employers are looking for
·
Formalized
internship programs
·
Workforce
training programs need to be working with the high schools and middle schools
·
Interactive,
2-way training, video, on-line training,
·
ESL
support
·
On-site
customized training
·
Training
for the older mature worker on how to adapt to a new way of working/new
technologies, working with a more diverse group of co-workers
·
JIT: employees to understand a push work
environment
·
Training
on quality, continuous improvements, statistical product control, ISO 9000
processes
·
Classes
on the Internet: how to use, email, how
to market on the Internet
·
Professional
development for management staff
·
Training
for people moving up from technical jobs to management/supervisory jobs
·
Safety
training, environmental issues, OSHA training etc.
Misc. suggestions:
·
Do
an employer orientation about what MHCC services are available to them.
·
Host
a day on MHCC campus for employers to meet with instructors
·
Employers
will come to the classroom, use them.
Bring them in - make it a close tie with the employer’s occupation and
employment need, brief them on what is expected, what are the outcomes from the
process, etc. be specific about what you want the employer to impart, but use
them more
·
MHCC
needs to do more marketing of itself – sell its programs
·
Internal
customer service training is needed, how to treat students and employers like
customers
·
Create
an evaluation system for students that can become part of their hiring
portfolio: comments from instructors,
attendance stats, something that will give an employer information about how
reliable and dependable this person was as a student. This is especially important for students with no work history.
East County Employer Survey/Focus Groups Results
Executive
Summary:
Over
the course of the past summer (1999), MHCC, with assistance from Joan Pasco,
consultant, conducted a mail survey and held focus group discussions with
members of the East County business community. The purpose of the survey and
focus groups was to gather information on the employment and training needs of
employers. The information gained as a result of this endeavor will help the
college in the formulation of strategic planning efforts through the first
decade of the new century. Following is a brief summary of what this community
of employers had to say in response to survey questions and focused discussion
sessions.
In
addition to the specifics described below, the employers also expressed a
strong need for flexibility in the delivery of educational and training
services. This includes technology-based services, such as Web-based and other
distance education delivery systems, that are independent of time and place.
Thus, MHCC will need to continue to expand and refine its instructional delivery
systems.
Essential
qualities
v
Virtually every respondent indicated
that ability, combined with a positive attitude and willingness to learn, are
the most important attributes of successful employees
Basic training
or “skill sets”
v
Basic math and communications abilities
v
Customer service training
v
Interpersonal/team building skills
Most common
reasons for rejecting a job applicant
v
Lack of ability to communicate
v
Unstable work history
v
Inappropriate or inadequate experience
v
Poor appearance or interview skills
v
Incomplete job applications
Specific
equipment job applicants should be able to use
v
Basic office equipment including
ü
10 key adding machines
ü
Calculators
ü
Word processing
ü
Spreadsheet software
Internal
strategies to recruit / retain qualified applicants
v
Employer contributions to
training/education/degrees
v
Flexible work schedules to accommodate
family needs
v
Use of current employees to
attract/recruit job applicants
v
Recruitment from training programs and
academic contacts
External
sources of recruitment
v
Classified ads 90%
v
Temp/Staffing services 40%
v
Walk-ins/signs in window 39%
v
Employment Department 38%
East County Employer Survey/Focus Groups Results
Introduction:
As
part of the master planning process, MHCC
2010, MHCC conducted a mail survey and held several focus group discussions
with members of the East County business community during the summer months of
1999. The purpose of these activities was two fold: first, to maintain
awareness of the training and education needs of local employers and second, to
assess employers’ perceptions of the state of readiness of job applicants.
Using
a mailing list obtained from East Multnomah County One Stop Career System,
surveys were sent to a representative sample of 580 East County businesses. The
survey was accompanied by a cover letter from Dr. Joel Vela, President of MHCC,
explaining the recent planning activities underway at the college and asking
the potential respondents for their participation in this ongoing effort to
develop the institutional master plan which will guide our development in the
first decade of the new century. Of these 580 local area employers, 66 (11%)
completed and returned the survey. In order to compliment the findings of the
written survey, a series of focus discussions with an additional 17 local area
employers were conducted with the assistance of Joan Pasco, consultant. The
survey and content of the follow-up discussion groups comprised six questions.
The following section presents a summary of responses to those questions. The
last section of this report presents a summary of the results of a focused
discussion group held in February 1999 which was used to help formulate the
questions used in the present survey and resultant focus discussion.
Highlights
of Employer Survey Responses:
1. What
special training or certification is required for jobs with your organization?
Virtually
every survey respondent indicated that a good attitude and the ability and
willingness to learn is one of the most important employee attributes. Specific skill requirements mentioned by
respondents included: basic math/algebra, communication skills, customer
service training, data entry, interpersonal/team building, making change/cash
handling, people skills, outgoing, friendly, reading and writing skills.
2. When you
must reject a job applicant, what are the most common reasons?
Employment
readiness topped the list of responses to this question. Lack of ability to
communicate, work with others, poor attitude, unstable work history, poor
appearance, poor interview skills, incomplete job applications, inappropriate
or lack of experience, lack of energy/hustle, immaturity, and lack of
confidence were the most common responses.
3. What
industry specific equipment do you expect job applicants to be able to use?
Respondents
indicated that most job applicants should be able to work with basic office
equipment including 10 key, adding machines, calculators, computer (word
processing and spreadsheets), copy, fax, and other basic office machines.
4. What
internal strategies have you developed to recruit qualified applicants?
Use
of current employees to attract/recruit job applicants was the most frequent
response. Many businesses offer cash
bonuses and other incentives to employees who successfully recruit new
employees. Retention and benefit
programs designed to retain a qualified workforce were often mentioned as
internal recruitment tools. Examples
include: employer contributions to training/education/degrees, and flexible
work schedules to accommodate family needs. Word of mouth, posting of job
openings, recruitment from training programs and academic contacts were also
frequent responses to this question. A few employers use commercial interview
and testing programs as part of their strategy to screen applicants.
5. When asked to select various external sources of recruitment, employers listed the following: